How We Know What We Know: The Social Construction of Academic Debate in Criminology

Tricia Klosky, Illinois State University
Ineke Haen Marshall, University of Nebraska at Omaha

ABSTRACT
The social constructionsit perspective has been applied to a variety of subjects within the discipline: hate crimes, child abuse, serial murder, deviance and police corruption. The primary premise behind social constructionism is that social problems are created through a process of claims making by interested claims makers. This paper makes the argument that the nature of scientific debate is no different from any other type of social problem creation/construction. Some claims are discarded while others are accepted and disseminated. This paper looks at some of the critical debates within criminology to make this point.

(Return to Program Resources)

Updated 05/20/2006